European Court of Human Rights Cases by Country

As a law enthusiast, I have always been fascinated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the impact it has had on human rights legislation across Europe. The ECHR has been instrumental in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of individuals in member states, and the cases it has presided over offer a wealth of insight into the evolving landscape of human rights law.

One particularly aspect ECHR variety cases handled different countries. By examining the distribution of cases by country, we can gain a better understanding of the human rights challenges faced by each nation and the ECHR`s role in addressing them.

ECHR Cases Country

To explore the distribution of ECHR cases by country, let`s take a look at some fascinating statistics:

Country	Number Cases
Russia	Over 20,000 cases
Turkey	Around 15,000 cases
Ukraine	Over 12,000 cases
Italy	Approximately 10,000 cases
Hungary	Around 8,000 cases

Case Studies

Let`s delve into a couple of notable ECHR cases to illustrate the impact of the court`s decisions:

Koky Others v. Slovakia

In this case, the ECHR ruled that the forced sterilization of Romani women in Slovakia was a violation of their human rights. The court`s decision shed light on the systemic discrimination faced by the Romani community in Slovakia and prompted the government to take tangible steps to address the issue.

OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia

This landmark case centered on the expropriation of Yukos, a major Russian oil company, by the Russian government. The ECHR`s ruling held Russia accountable for violating the company`s property rights and provided a significant precedent for cases involving state interference with private enterprises.

These case studies underscore the ECHR`s pivotal role in upholding human rights and holding member states accountable for their actions.

The ECHR`s cases by country offer a compelling glimpse into the diverse human rights challenges faced across Europe. By analyzing the distribution of cases and studying individual case studies, we can appreciate the profound impact of the court`s decisions on shaping human rights legislation and fostering a culture of accountability.

European Court of Human Rights Cases by Country Contract

This contract is entered into on [Date] by and between the European Court of Human Rights, hereinafter referred to as “the Court”, and [Country Name], hereinafter referred to as “the Party”.

Clause	Description
1	The Party acknowledges the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights over cases concerning violations of the European Convention on Human Rights within its territory.
2	The Party agrees to abide by the decisions and judgments of the Court in cases brought against it by individuals or groups alleging violations of their human rights under the Convention.
3	The Party shall provide full cooperation to the Court in the investigation and adjudication of cases brought before it, including granting access to relevant documents, witnesses, and legal proceedings.
4	The Party agrees to implement and enforce any remedies or measures ordered by the Court in cases where violations of the Convention are found to have occurred within its territory.
5	The Court shall notify the Party of any cases brought against it and provide an opportunity for the Party to present its arguments and evidence before the Court renders a judgment.
6	This contract shall remain in effect until such time as the Party formally withdraws from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Convention.

Top 10 Legal Questions about European Court of Human Rights Cases by Country

Question	Answer
1. What is the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and its role in cases involving European countries?	The ECtHR is an international court established to hear applications alleging violations of the civil and political rights set out in the European Convention on Human Rights. It plays a crucial role in ensuring that member states uphold their obligations under the Convention and provides a mechanism for individuals to seek justice at a supranational level.
2. Can individuals or groups from any European country bring a case before the ECtHR?	Yes, individuals, groups, and even non-governmental organizations from any of the 47 member states of the Council of Europe can submit applications to the ECtHR if they believe their rights under the Convention have been violated.
3. What are the most common types of cases brought before the ECtHR by different European countries?	Common cases involve alleged violations of the right to a fair trial, freedom of expression, right to life, prohibition of torture, and the right to a private and family life. However, the ECtHR has jurisdiction over a wide range of rights and freedoms protected by the Convention.
4. How are judgments issued by the ECtHR enforced in the various European countries?	Once the ECtHR delivers a judgment, it is the responsibility of the member state concerned to ensure that the violation is remedied and that just satisfaction is provided to the applicant. This can involve legislative or policy changes, compensation, or other forms of redress.
5. What is the process for appealing a decision made by the ECtHR in cases involving European countries?	Decisions of the ECtHR are final, and there is no formal mechanism for appealing against them. However, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe monitors the execution of judgments and can take further action if a state fails to fulfill its obligations.
6. How does the ECtHR balance the principle of subsidiarity in cases involving European countries?	The principle of subsidiarity requires the ECtHR to give a certain margin of appreciation to member states in implementing human rights standards. The Court will only intervene where it is necessary to ensure the effective protection of rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Convention.
7. Are there any notable landmark cases decided by the ECtHR involving European countries?	Yes, there have been several landmark cases that have had a significant impact on human rights jurisprudence, such as the cases of Soering v. United Kingdom on extradition and Chahal v. United Kingdom on the prohibition of torture. These cases have helped shape the development of human rights law in Europe.
8. What role do national courts play in the ECtHR`s decisions involving European countries?	National courts are the primary guarantors of human rights, and the ECtHR generally expects individuals to exhaust domestic remedies before applying to the Court. National courts also have the responsibility to interpret and apply the Convention in accordance with the principles established by the ECtHR.
9. How does the ECtHR ensure consistency in its decisions across different European countries?	The ECtHR applies a doctrine of precedent, where it considers its previous decisions as authoritative interpretations of the Convention. This allows for the development of a coherent and principled approach to human rights protection, ensuring consistency in its jurisprudence.
10. What are the potential implications of Brexit on the ECtHR`s jurisdiction over cases involving the UK?	The UK`s withdrawal from the European Union does not affect its membership in the Council of Europe and the jurisdiction of the ECtHR. Therefore, the Court will continue to hear cases involving the UK and ensure the protection of human rights in the country.